Fujifilm Fp 100b Compatible Polaroid 600

The professional army dreams a civil servant SPÖ

It is accusing the People's Party that it has the Defence Minister Darabos expressed distrust. This may well have been purely tactical reasons, because of the incompetence and amateurism of the Defence Minister, there can be no doubt. But the ÖVP would endanger the coalition, since it is less serious threat to the Austrian population by such a defense.

He has the army and the defense do not know.

He has management and staff of Guide no idea.

His concepts are based on dreams and hippy fantasies.

So naturally, the question that the defense is held every year 70 000 prospects for the army, very appropriate. So much he would need that is because not everyone is good also for soldiers. That this number can never be reached, the defense minister, of course, is silent and that he therefore must lower the criteria and requirements, it also conceals. Who will be great because in Number of volunteer? Neo-Nazis and teenagers, or trigger-happy fools weapons?

For the people we would like to see the Army has to pay Mr Darabos something strong and stir the word. Maybe then he attracts 6000 - 8000 good soldiers that meet the criteria. But dreams Mr. Darabos not assume that his militia system would be much cheaper even than the military service?

Sweden too, that is so fond of Defense cited as a model, has big problems, so many to find volunteers to the army.

I also think it is wrong to think that one would need only a small, powerful professional army. It is precisely the Civil Defence, who is Mr. Darabos much more important than the military tasks required many hands, which are quickly available. This is precisely with a militia system did not exist and also with a professional system, it is not given.

In the end, I am sure this militia system Darabos brand is not only more expensive than the current host, but also much less efficient.

Even the social services supposed to be more expensive than the civil service.

turns in total, the "military reform" as a cheap attempt to crush the army and left as a romantic reverie of peace, joy, friendship and pancakes.

It has nothing to do with cost savings, nor with national defense or civil defense, and certainly it has nothing to do with improving efficiency.

That leaves the ÖVP for opportunistic reasons, the Defence Minister in the Office once again shows that no matter how it is and how our future no matter even it is the army. I am indeed only a passing reference value that the Vice-Chancellor (Josef Pröll / ÖVP) the oh-so-creative suggestion of his uncle from Lower Austria (Erwin Pröll), conscription to 5 months reduce, finds worthy of consideration. (What problem would be solved it?) It just shows how dependent the Vice-Chancellor is of a good will of his uncle. Maybe we should Austrians take us to the Egyptians as an example and will remain at the Heroes' Square, to abdicate our "superiors" easy.

I demand democracy at last - for Austria.

Dog Has A Trapped Nerve In Back

Like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to be real Democrats

Is not that amazing?

What has not cheered the television coverage. The anti-Mubarak movement was supported by all sections of society. So you would need at all to worry that the Muslim Brotherhood also demonstrated with. It would only retroactively to the "democracy-train" cracked. You got no power, the revolution to attach to their flags.

But now it came to the first negotiations with the Mubarak government and lo and behold, the Muslim Brothers are the first to negotiate with those Mubarak.

appear in the media now so the situation as if the Muslim Brotherhood for democracy and human rights are and Mubarak for a cruel and inhumane regime. First of all we should emphasize that President Mubarak was of the Socialist International that he was a reliable partner of the West and that would have been worse the situation in Israel many times, he would the Islamic fundamentalists is not curbed. It is significant that the gas lines are already being blown up by Islamists to Israel, although Mubarak is not even gone. This may well be seen as a foretaste of what the future is from a supposedly democratic Egypt .

In the beginning it was said that the Muslim Brothers have jumped only to the demonstrations, when they were already widespread.

Now it is, Mubarak discussed with the Muslim brothers and gas pipelines to Israel to be blown into the air.

In half a year then the Muslim Brotherhood form a government and the ORF is probably always dream of democracy, therefore, anything.

Tumkur Mallige Blue Film

revolution in Egypt is this: can the matter be?

If one considers the coverage of the ORF is right and morally correct, is clear:

The Egyptian revolution is well and brings the Egyptian people - indeed the world - more freedom and democracy. But where the ORF is actually his hopes?

It is quite clear that after the Mubarak era will create a political vacuum. Nor does hardly an Egyptian think about what will happen after the revolution. Yet they fight for a large target, but soon they will realize that with the expulsion of the dictator, not a single problem is solved. On the contrary.

Radical Islamism is scenting his opportunity. President Hosni Mubarak was a guarantee against the Islamists (who enjoy a lot of influence in Egypt).

Islamism has come to Egypt in a good chance to power - much better odds than democracy.

The young Egyptian men have little future prospects, opportunities and few chances to get married, little education and virtually no experience with democracy.

The social pressure to act in Islam is correct, very large and strongly impedes the process of shaping their own lives.

take no coincidence that the Yemeni dictator already arrangements. The entire Islamic world, Egypt monitored closely. An Arab conflagration would be a tremendous destabilizing the political situation. We imagine, in three or four Islamic countries created Iranian government relations. Instead of seeing more stability in the West many, his hostile Islamic states towards. The polarization of the Arab world against the Western world could then be much stronger than today. A conflagration can not be our wish, but it should be our concern.

Even in Iran there was a revolution, but in the end has not won democracy, but an Islamist regime that oppressed the people just as the band before.

Islam and democracy can not exist harmoniously co. Wherever Islam is gaining strength, the democracy will be weakened.

The fact that the Muslim Brotherhood is not strong enough to form a government of Egypt does not mean that the risk of radicalization would be banned. Both Hamas and Al Qaeda have a major impact on the Egyptians. If the wall Hosni Mubarak has fallen, these extremists will seize their chance. If they do not come to power, they will destabilize the country. Until the resistance and the democracy movement have died. Because that Islam means by "peace."

The recent persecution of Christians in Egypt until the prelude might have been.

As in Iraq, there will be genocide on Christians in Egypt, as in Islam are common to come.

It does not matter whether an Islamic government is in power, or whether there is a political vacuum. In both cases, the Christians will be victims.

But to understand the ORF difficult and probably not popular enough.